Session 9: Wed 22nd

22nd September Session 9 15.40 - 17.20

Draft programme - this may be subject to change

Session 9A - Techno-Econominc Comparisons Session Chairs: Ram Narula and Nils Rokke

1. Techno-Economic Outlook of Ammonia-Based Post-Combustion CO₂ Capture: Peter Versteeg, Edward Rubin; Carnegie Mellon University

2. Techno-Economic Assessment of Future-Proofing Coal Plants with Post-Combustion Capture against Technology Developments: Mathieu Lucquiaud, Olivia Errey; Hannah Chalmers; School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh & Mechanical Engineering Department, Imperial College London, Xi Lang, Electricity Policy Research Group, University of Cambridge Jon Gibbins; School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, mohammad Abu-Zahra; IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme

3. Techno-Economic Evaluation of Biomass Fired or Co-Fired Power Plant with Post Combustion CO₂ Capture: Stanley Santos; IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Paolo Cotone, Franco Gasparini, Rosa Domenichini; Foster Wheeler Italiana SpA

4. Post Combustion Capture of CO₂ from Coal-fired Power Plants in China and Australia: A Cost Comparison: Paul Feron, Narendra Dave, Thong Do; CSIRO Energy Technology, Doug Palfreyman; PalCom Systems Pty Ltd, Shiwang Gao, Lianbo Liu, Shisen Xu; Thermal Power Research Institute

5. Alternative Approaches for Decarbonizing Existing US Coal Power Plant Sites: Robert H. Williams, Thomas G. Kruetz, Eric D. Larson; Princeton University, Guangjian Liu; Princeton University & North China Electric Power University

Session 9B - Public Perception and CCS  Session Chairs: Dancker Daamen and Diana Schumann

1. Public Awareness and Perceptions of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS): Insights from Surveys Administered to Representative Samples in Six European Countries (Results from over 6000 respondents): Kaja Pietzner; Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, Diana Schumann; Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Sturle D. Tveldt, Robert Naess; SINTEF & The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Hans Y. Torvatn; SINTEF, David M. Rainer; University of Cambridge, Sorin Anghel; National Institute of Marine Geology and Geoecology GeoEcoMar, Diana Cismaru; National School of Political Studies and Public Administration, Carmencita Constantin; Institute for Studies and Power Engineering ISPE, Dancker D. Daamen; Leiden University

2. Assessing Public Perceptions of CCS: Benefits, Challenges and Methods: Thomas Roberts, Sarah Mander; Tyndall Centre For Climate Change Research, University of Manchester

3. A Study on Roles of Public Survey and Focus Groups to Assess Public Opinions for CCS Implementation: Kenshi Itaoka, Aya Saito;Mizuho Information & Research Institute Inc, Makoto Akai; National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology

4. Awareness, Knowledge, Beliefs, and Opinions Regarding CCS of the Dutch General Public Before and After Information: Marjolein de Best-Waldhober, Mia Pauklovic, Suzanne Burnsting; ECN, Dancker D. Daamen; Leiden University

5. Measuring Regional Attitudes towards Proposed CCS Plants: A Four Country Comparison: David Reiner, Glenn Kristiansen; University of Cambridge, Kaja Pietzner, Andrea Esken; Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, Diana Schumann; Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Sturle Tvedt, Hans Torvatn; SINTEF; Dancker Daamne, Emma ter Mors, Bart Tewel; Leiden University

Session 9C - Seals Session Chairs: James Underschultz and Steve Crawley

1. The Mechanical Behaviour of Anhydrite and the Effect of Deformation on Permeability Development - Implications for Caprock Integrity During Geological Storage of CO₂: Suzanne Hangx; High Pressure and Temperature Laboratory, Utrecht University & Shell International Exploration and Production BV, Chris Spiers, Colin Preach; High Pressure and Temperature Laboratory, Utrecht University

2. Evaluation of the Petrophysical Properties of a Carbonate-Rich Caprock for Geological Storage Purposes: Nicolas Tonnet, Daniel Broseta; University of Pau, France, Gérard Mouronval; Total Centre Scientifique et Technique, Pau, France

3. Changes in Containment Properties of Claystone Caprocks Induced by Dissolved CO₂ Seepage: Influence of Calcite Content: Guillaume Berthe, Isabelle Devol-Brown; IRSN, Jean-Luc Michelot; Université Paris-Sud, Orasay, Sébastien Savoye; CEA

4. Evaluating Sealing Efficiency of Caprocks for CO₂ Storage: An Overview of the Geocarbone Integrity Program and Results: Marc Fleury, Institut Français du Pétrole, Rueil-Malmaison, Jaques Pironon; Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine, Nancy, Yves-Michel le Nindre; Bureau de Recherche Géologique et Minière, Orleans, Olivier Bildstein; Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Vincent Lagneau; École des Mines de Paris, Paris, Daniel Broseta; Laboratoire des Fluides Complexes, Pau, Thierry Pichery; Gaz de France, St Denis la Plaine, Simon Fillacier; Geostock, Rueil-Malmaison, Marc Lescanne; Total, Pau, Olivier Vidal; Laboratoire de Géodynamique des Chaines Alpines , Grenoble

Session 9D - Site Characterisation (II) Session Chairs: Bill Senior and Peter Cook

1. Carbon Dioxide Storage Leads of the Eastern Gippsland Basin, Australia - Nomenclature, Seal and Structure Considerations in Trap Integrity Assessments:J. Sayers; Australian School of Petroleum, Cooperative Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies & Geoscience Australia, R.Hills, R. Daniel; Australian School of Petroleum & Cooperative Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies P. Boult; Gingko Resources, L. Spencer; Ophir Exploration Consultants Pty. Ltd.

2. A potential CO₂ Storage Solution in the Bohai Basin, East China?: Ceri Vincent; British Geological Survey, Rongshu Zeng; Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wenying Chen; Energy Environment Economy (3E) Institute, Tsinghua, Mingyuan Li; Enhanced Oil recovery research Centre, China University of Petroleum Beijing; Guosheng Ding; Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina Company, Ltd,Langfang, Niels Poulsen; Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland

3. Technical Challenges in Characterization of Future CO₂ Storage Dite in a Deep Saline Aquifer in the Paris basin. Lessons Learned from Practical Application of Site Selection Methodology: Yann le Gallo, Simon Fillacier, Anthony Lecomte; Geogreen, Frank Hanot; CDP consulting, Natalia Quisel, Nicolas Rampnoux, Bernard Lanfranchi; Veolia Environnement Recherche & Innovation

4. The Heartland Area Redwater CO₂ Storage Project (HARP): Results of Phase I Site Characterization: Stefan Bachu, Dan Palombi; Alberta Research Council, Frank Stoakes; SCG Ltd.Jack Wendte; Geological Survey of Canada, Don Lawton; University of Calgary, Mehran Pooladi-Darwish; Fekete Associates Inc., Chris Hawkes; University of Saskatchewan, Richard Chalaturnyk; University of Alberta; Terry Krawec, Willian Sawchuck; ARC Resources Ltd.

5. The Path to a Successful One Million-Tonne Demonstration of Geological Sequestration: Characterization, Cooperation, and Collaboration: Robert Finley, Sallie Greenberg, Scott Frailey, Ivan Krapac, JHannes Leetaru; Illinois State Geological Survey, Scott Marsteller; Schlumberger Carbon Services

Session 9E - EOR Session Chairs: Guillemette Picard and Henk Pagnier

1. CO₂ Storage in Depleted Oilfields: The Worldwide Potential for Carbon Dioxide Enhanced Oil Recovery: Michael Godec, Vello Kuuskraa, Tyler Vnan Leeuwen; Advanced Resources International, Inc., Neil Wildgust; IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme

2. Net CO₂ Stored in North American EOR Projects: John Faltinson; Alberta Research Council, Bill Gunter; G Bach Enterprises Inc.

3. Jumpstarting CCS using Oil Refinery CO₂ for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Richard Middleton, Gordon Keating, Rajesh pawar, Philip Staufer; Los Alamos National Laboratory, Jeffrey Bielicki; Oak Ridge National Laboratory

4. Carbonated Water Injection (CWI) – A Productive Way of Using CO₂ for Oil Recovery and CO₂ Storage: Mehran Sohrabi, Masoud Riazi, Mahmoud Jamiolahmady, Nor Idah Kechut, Shaun Ireland, Graeme Robertson, Chris Brown; Heriot-Watt University

Session 9F - Discussion Panel - Challenges to Implementing CCS Demonstration Projects

The Scope of the Challenges in Implementing CCS Projects Panel is to provide participants with real feed back on experiences/lesson learnt groups/organisations that have been developing Commercial scale CCS projects. The panel will aim to provide a balanced view from industry groups/government and project developers giving their perspective of the issues involved, the issues to be resolved and guidance on the pitfalls governments/project developers might face.

           Panel Champion: Bill Koppe, GCCSI, Australia
           Panel Members:         

1. Graham Sweeney, Executive Vice President. Future Fuels & CO₂, Chair of the EU ZEP programme who could give an overview of the issues faced by industry in Europe and what the ZEP has been doing to help facilitate the implementation of CCS demonstration projects
2. Rachel Crisp, Director of Delivery, Office of CCS, UK Department of Energy and Climate Change

    3.   Gardiner Hill, Alternative Energy,  Special Advisor on CCS, BP
    4.   Arthur Lee, Chevron Fellow and Principal Advisor, Chevron Corporation

The session will comprise a short introduction from the Chair (Bill Koppe) to introduce the session. Followed by 10 minutes presentation from each panel member.  There will then follow a discussion session with the delegates attending. We expect some 200 delegates could attend.

Session 9G - Policy Instruments Session Chairs: Juho Lipponen and erika de Visser

1. Establishing a CCS Master Plan for National Governments-Lessons Learnt: Marten Slagter, Edmund Wellenstein, Fokke Rispens; EBN Chris Hendriks, Joris Koorneef; Ecofys

2. Financing Early Opportunity CCS Projects in Emerging Economies: Mitigation Potential and Costs: Paul Zakkor, Gregory Cook; Carbon Counts, Tim Dixon; IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme

3. CCS in the CDM – How Could it Work?: Kenneth Möllersten; Mälardalen University, Tim Dixon; IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Ulrika, Raab; Swedish Energy Agency

4. Geologic Sequestration through EOR: Policy and Regulatory Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Accounting: Sean McCoy, Paulina Jaramillo; Carnegie Mellon University, Melisa Pollak; University of Minnesota

5. Bilateral and Multilateral Processes and their Progress Towards Achieving Effective Implementation of CCS: Markus Hagemann,Chris Hendriks, Martina Jung; Ecofys, Stefan Bakker, Tom Mikunda, Heleen de Coninck; Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands